Approximately two weeks left in the first-time buyer and move-up buyer tax credit period. For those of you still looking to take advantage of the credit, you must have a completely executed contract by April 30 and be able to close no later than June 30.
However, if you are not one of the select few to have your home under contract by the deadline in order to get your $6500, don't despair...there are still great reasons to keep your home on the market, sell your home and purchase a new one!
Rates are still low. Regardless of how familiar we have gotten with historically low rates, this is set to change. The federal government has put a halt on purchasing mortgage-backed securities meaning that banks will start charging more to lend money-resulting in that higher rate.
A small change such as a 1/2 to 1% can easily eat up the tax credit advantage. I have blogged previously about the actual numbers (see archives), but 1% can change your payment as much as a price decrease of 10% can. What does that mean to sellers who need to sell in order to buy?
Price your home not just competitively but make it compelling. Get a secured contract in hand while you can still take advantage of low interest rates, inventory selection and prices that have been whittled away over the course of the past year. You may take a hit on the front side however, if you ever see yourself needing more space, a better location, easier maintenance or the like, NOW IS THE TIME!!
It is my opinion that the momentum of the credit has peaked and most folks who are going take advantage of the credit have made efforts to do so, but that means opportunity for others. Our housing market won't be confined by governmental whims and incentives but rather in true market supplies and demands. Once the dust settles we are going to have a very good idea of where our local market stands and I think those that took advantage of historical real estate situations will certainly be pleased with themselves in years to come--especially in the Triad!
Feel free to call me or email me to discuss your personal real estate situation!
www.BrookeCashion.com
brooke.cashion@allentate.com
336-817-3598
Showing posts with label tax credit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tax credit. Show all posts
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Free House? Depends on how you view the glass...
Well, there isn't such a thing and home ownership does come with a ton of responsibility, but nothing is more American than owning your own home. With the extension and expansion of the tax credit and the raising of the limit of how much money you can make in order to qualify (125k-singles**225K-couples), there has never been a time that felt more like, well, free!
If you take the notion of a borrower paying $900 in interest and property taxes each month, this would equate to a loan amount of $165,000. At this loan amount, the interest is around $690 and the property taxes, let's say are $210 for a total of $900--both of these items being normal tax write-offs.
So on this $900/month budget or $10,800 per year they are probably close to a 25% tax bracket with federal and state taxes, so they could potential recognize $2700 in income tax benefits PLUS the additional $8000 in credits from the stimulus!
WOW! They just got their home for $100 this year! Of course, back to the expenses...there is of course home owners insurance, which should be a little more than the renter's insurance they SHOULD be carrying and they will have to maintain their new home.
In this situation it is obviously one scenario and as I tell all of my clients, even those who look like they have "cut and dry" situations, that they need to consult their tax advisor. I also have to say that this novel idea was not mine, but passed on to me by a dear mortgage associate.
Bottom line is this...the tax credit was extended and expanded and if you are even remotely considering moving up or out, NOW IS THE TIME! Any financial advisor that you read in the WSJ or see on t.v preach that this is a historic time for buying real estate...imagine the value 20 years from now!
Make the credit work for you and give me a call so that I can help point you in the right direction so that you too can take your piece of the stimulus pie!
If you take the notion of a borrower paying $900 in interest and property taxes each month, this would equate to a loan amount of $165,000. At this loan amount, the interest is around $690 and the property taxes, let's say are $210 for a total of $900--both of these items being normal tax write-offs.
So on this $900/month budget or $10,800 per year they are probably close to a 25% tax bracket with federal and state taxes, so they could potential recognize $2700 in income tax benefits PLUS the additional $8000 in credits from the stimulus!
WOW! They just got their home for $100 this year! Of course, back to the expenses...there is of course home owners insurance, which should be a little more than the renter's insurance they SHOULD be carrying and they will have to maintain their new home.
In this situation it is obviously one scenario and as I tell all of my clients, even those who look like they have "cut and dry" situations, that they need to consult their tax advisor. I also have to say that this novel idea was not mine, but passed on to me by a dear mortgage associate.
Bottom line is this...the tax credit was extended and expanded and if you are even remotely considering moving up or out, NOW IS THE TIME! Any financial advisor that you read in the WSJ or see on t.v preach that this is a historic time for buying real estate...imagine the value 20 years from now!
Make the credit work for you and give me a call so that I can help point you in the right direction so that you too can take your piece of the stimulus pie!
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Feds Hedging on Extension of Tax Credit....
This article appeared today. What are your thoughts on whether or not the tax credit should be extended or revamped to include "move-up" buyers?
HUD Secretary Hedges on Extension of Homebuyer Tax CreditOct 20, 2009 11:30 AM
By Richard Rubin,
CQ StaffHousing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan equivocated Tuesday on whether Congress should extend an expiring tax credit for first-time homebuyers.“I can assure you that the administration will work with Congress to fashion appropriate and effective homebuyer incentives, mindful of both their benefits to stimulating new demand and their costs to the American taxpayer,” he said in prepared testimony for a Tuesday morning hearing of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. Donovan acknowledged congressional support for an extension, but he did not endorse it himself.The current $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers, created in the economic stimulus package (PL 111-5) enacted early this year, expires Nov. 30. Housing and real estate interests and their allies on Capitol Hill are pushing hard for an extension. Some also want to make the credit available to all home purchasers, not just first-time buyers, and to loosen the income eligibility limits.Various extension proposals have drawn support from lawmakers in both parties, including Senate Banking Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn.“The credit is set to expire in five weeks,” Dodd said in his prepared opening statement. “But the work of stabilizing the housing market won’t be done. We still need to use every tool at our disposal to fix this problem.”The intensified focus on the tax credit’s looming expiration came as the Commerce Department said Tuesday that while construction of new homes and apartments rose 0.5 percent in September, new applications for building permits fell 1.2 percent. That was the sharpest decline since a 2.5 percent drop in April and may have reflected uncertainty about the tax credit.Under questioning from Dodd, Donovan said there was “clear evidence” that the tax credit has helped housing markets, but he added that the administration wants to do more research on the costs.“We understand the urgency of this situation,” Donovan said. “And we believe that within the next few weeks, we will have additional data that will allow us to sit down with you” and discuss whether and how to extend the credit.Donovan downplayed the potential impact of allowing the tax credit to expire as scheduled next month. “The end of the tax credit would have some negative implications for the market,” he conceded, “but I do not believe based on all of the other actions that we’re taking . . . I do not believe that a catastrophic decline would be the result of the end of the tax credit.”The lead Senate supporter of an extension, Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., also testified at the hearing.Under a plan he is trying to attach to legislation extending unemployment benefits (H.R. 3548), the tax credit would be available to all purchasers of a primary residence. His proposal would double the allowable income of homebuyers eligible for the tax credit, to $150,000 per year for individuals and $300,000 for married couples. The credit would be available through June 30, and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates it would cost $16.7 billion, according to Isakson’s office.“It brings a lot of Americans to the market that are sitting on the sidelines today,” Isakson said of his plan to broaden the credit, pointing in particular to the “move-up” market among people who already own homes.Isakson said that based on his conversations with administration officials and his Senate colleagues, he did not think there was support for boosting the maximum credit to $15,000, as he originally proposed, or extending it beyond June 30, 2010.“It’s the art of the doable and the art of the possible,” he said.Many economists have criticized the tax credit, saying that it would subsidize people who would buy houses anyway.Sen. Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the committee’s ranking Republican, echoed those concerns and said “some basic questions need to be answered” before the credit is extended. He also said that a credit offset by a reduction in government spending would have a much different impact from an extension offset by higher taxes elsewhere.Supporters of the bill have varying ideas on whether and how any extension should be offset. Isakson and Dodd said they are looking for offsets.“If we can find a pay-for, I’m all for it,” said Dodd.
Source: CQ Today Online News
HUD Secretary Hedges on Extension of Homebuyer Tax CreditOct 20, 2009 11:30 AM
By Richard Rubin,
CQ StaffHousing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan equivocated Tuesday on whether Congress should extend an expiring tax credit for first-time homebuyers.“I can assure you that the administration will work with Congress to fashion appropriate and effective homebuyer incentives, mindful of both their benefits to stimulating new demand and their costs to the American taxpayer,” he said in prepared testimony for a Tuesday morning hearing of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. Donovan acknowledged congressional support for an extension, but he did not endorse it himself.The current $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers, created in the economic stimulus package (PL 111-5) enacted early this year, expires Nov. 30. Housing and real estate interests and their allies on Capitol Hill are pushing hard for an extension. Some also want to make the credit available to all home purchasers, not just first-time buyers, and to loosen the income eligibility limits.Various extension proposals have drawn support from lawmakers in both parties, including Senate Banking Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn.“The credit is set to expire in five weeks,” Dodd said in his prepared opening statement. “But the work of stabilizing the housing market won’t be done. We still need to use every tool at our disposal to fix this problem.”The intensified focus on the tax credit’s looming expiration came as the Commerce Department said Tuesday that while construction of new homes and apartments rose 0.5 percent in September, new applications for building permits fell 1.2 percent. That was the sharpest decline since a 2.5 percent drop in April and may have reflected uncertainty about the tax credit.Under questioning from Dodd, Donovan said there was “clear evidence” that the tax credit has helped housing markets, but he added that the administration wants to do more research on the costs.“We understand the urgency of this situation,” Donovan said. “And we believe that within the next few weeks, we will have additional data that will allow us to sit down with you” and discuss whether and how to extend the credit.Donovan downplayed the potential impact of allowing the tax credit to expire as scheduled next month. “The end of the tax credit would have some negative implications for the market,” he conceded, “but I do not believe based on all of the other actions that we’re taking . . . I do not believe that a catastrophic decline would be the result of the end of the tax credit.”The lead Senate supporter of an extension, Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., also testified at the hearing.Under a plan he is trying to attach to legislation extending unemployment benefits (H.R. 3548), the tax credit would be available to all purchasers of a primary residence. His proposal would double the allowable income of homebuyers eligible for the tax credit, to $150,000 per year for individuals and $300,000 for married couples. The credit would be available through June 30, and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates it would cost $16.7 billion, according to Isakson’s office.“It brings a lot of Americans to the market that are sitting on the sidelines today,” Isakson said of his plan to broaden the credit, pointing in particular to the “move-up” market among people who already own homes.Isakson said that based on his conversations with administration officials and his Senate colleagues, he did not think there was support for boosting the maximum credit to $15,000, as he originally proposed, or extending it beyond June 30, 2010.“It’s the art of the doable and the art of the possible,” he said.Many economists have criticized the tax credit, saying that it would subsidize people who would buy houses anyway.Sen. Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the committee’s ranking Republican, echoed those concerns and said “some basic questions need to be answered” before the credit is extended. He also said that a credit offset by a reduction in government spending would have a much different impact from an extension offset by higher taxes elsewhere.Supporters of the bill have varying ideas on whether and how any extension should be offset. Isakson and Dodd said they are looking for offsets.“If we can find a pay-for, I’m all for it,” said Dodd.
Source: CQ Today Online News
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)